About Dave Marsay

I blog at djmarsay.wordpress.com.

From an early age I wondered at the range of different ‘adult’ reasoning styles and the confidence with which they contradicted each other and took it upon themselves to assume superiority over mine. ‘Might is right’ and ‘because everyone thinks so’ did not appeal. Even Darwinian socialism, which says that evolution favours the ‘best’, so those who have done best must be right, has never had much intellectual appeal for me. (We seem to be swept by fashions in at least some of the details of reasoning – how can we tell that things have stabilised?)

The old argument that ‘westernism’ is superior to ‘easternism’ because we have been more favoured by ‘the markets’ has lost its force post the crash of 2008 and the rise of Asia. So how do we recognise the ‘real deal’ for reasoning? Can we transcend the accident of our history that had us raised in a particular culture?

I was born and raised in suburbs of London, UK, that stood out as mixing pots of cultures on social maps of the time. No culture had a clear superiority, but the engineers, scientists and mathematicians (of various ethnic backgrounds) stood out as at least making an effort to reason well, and in having methods that stood up well in certain (narrow) domains. And at that time, such reasoning skills were widely appreciated and the development of them a recognized means of advancement.

At that time anyone who kept just half an eye out for debates on mathematics and its significance to settling society’s questions found much of interest. For example, mathematics is obviously about counting things, and one of the most important things to count is votes. So what do we make of Arrow’s Theorem? Do we conclude that mathematics is useless outside a narrow domain, or do we think that mathematics has helped to uncover some limitations of ‘common sense’, and think that it might be useful to uncover some more?

This blog seeks to identify some key titbits. You can start with my posts, mycomments on the works of others, or my own semi-original thoughts. I can also be found on LinkedIn.

Dr DJ Marsay: C.Math; Fellow, IMA; Senior Research Fellow, ISRS (UCL).

64 Responses to About Dave Marsay

  1. Pingback: How much complexity and uncertainty? | djmarsay

  2. Pingback: Complexity, uncertainty and heuristics | djmarsay

  3. Pingback: Metaphors for complexity and uncertainty | djmarsay

  4. Pingback: The new mathematics of voting? | djmarsay

  5. Pingback: Scientists of the subprime | djmarsay

  6. Pingback: Synthetic Modelling of Uncertain Temporal Systems | djmarsay

  7. Pingback: Induction and epochs | djmarsay

  8. Pingback: Reasoning under uncertainty methods | djmarsay

  9. Pingback: Life’s Other Secret | djmarsay

  10. Pingback: Holism and Evolution | djmarsay

  11. Pingback: Quantum Evolution | djmarsay

  12. Pingback: Good Infererence from Utterances? | djmarsay

  13. Pingback: Good Inferences from Utterances? | djmarsay

  14. Pingback: Gordon Brown: Beyond the Crash | djmarsay

  15. Pingback: Decoding Reality | djmarsay

  16. Pingback: Pragmatism and mathematics | djmarsay

  17. Pingback: AV or FPTP, according to wikipedia and Jenkins | djmarsay

  18. Pingback: ESP and significance | djmarsay

  19. Pingback: AV: the worst example | djmarsay

  20. Pingback: Examples of Uncertainty in Real Decisions | djmarsay

  21. Pingback: Critique of Pure Reason | djmarsay

  22. Pingback: Sources of Uncertainty | djmarsay

  23. Pingback: Illustrations of Uncertainty | djmarsay

  24. Pingback: Cynefin Framework | djmarsay

  25. Pingback: Out of Control | djmarsay

  26. Pingback: All watched over by machines of loving grace | djmarsay

  27. Pingback: Cybernetics and epochs | djmarsay

  28. Pingback: Regulation and epochs | djmarsay

  29. Pingback: How to Grow a Mind | djmarsay

  30. Pingback: The Precautionary Principle and Risk | djmarsay

  31. Pingback: Uncertainty and risk ‘Heat Maps’ | djmarsay

  32. Pingback: Induction, novelty and possibilistic causality | djmarsay

  33. Pingback: Uncertainty, utility and paradox | djmarsay

  34. Pingback: Science advice and the management of risk | djmarsay

  35. Pingback: Finding the true meaning of risk | djmarsay

  36. Pingback: When and why do people avoid unknown probabilities in decisions under uncertainty? | djmarsay

  37. Pingback: Better than Rational | djmarsay

  38. Pingback: Reasoning and natural selection | djmarsay

  39. Pingback: Complexity Demystified: A guide for practitioners | djmarsay

  40. Pingback: Cyber Doctrine | djmarsay

  41. Pingback: Composability | djmarsay

  42. Pingback: From Being to Becoming | djmarsay

  43. Pingback: Quantum Minds | djmarsay

  44. Pingback: The Logic of Scientific Discovery | djmarsay

  45. Pingback: How to live in a world that we don’t understand, and enjoy it (Taleb) | djmarsay

  46. Pingback: Bretton Woods: Modelling and Economics | djmarsay

  47. Pingback: Systemism: the alternative to individualism and holism | djmarsay

  48. Pingback: Kahneman et al’s Anomalies | djmarsay

  49. Pingback: Prigogine’s From Being to Becoming | djmarsay

  50. Pingback: Is there a reasonable way to count votes? | djmarsay

  51. Pingback: The voice of science: let’s agree to disagree (Nature) | djmarsay

  52. Pingback: GLS Shackle, imagined and deemed possible? « djmarsay

  53. Pingback: Fat tails and Epochs « djmarsay

  54. Pingback: How mathematical modelling seduced Wall Street (NS) « djmarsay

  55. Pingback: Knightian uncertainty and epochs « djmarsay

  56. Pingback: UK judge rules against probability theory? « djmarsay

  57. Pingback: The End of a Physics Worldview (Kauffman) « djmarsay

  58. Pingback: Making your mind up (NS) « djmarsay

  59. Could I just throw these into the ring. The Unified Field Theory (aka The Grand Unification Theory), The Theory of Everything, N-Theory and Choas Mathematics?

    The universe has to be a closed system doesn’t it?

    To me it follows that everything inside is fundamentally connected – especially connections through spaces (dimensions) unobservable from you physical location, like the trajectory of bird an obstacle. When it passes behind the object obscuring it it enters a dimension we cannot see and, and can therefore no longer predict – unless you can see through time.

    It has been observed in animals with acute perception of polarized light AND charge (static electricity) have a gift for *lightening* fast reflexes. So fast in fact it has been speculated that they have this limited ability to literally predict an event before it occurs.

    This is hardly surprise they have two more senses giving them binocular vision on a space that we can’t see – or can we?

    The man who finds or has the unified field theory would be able to turn it into a regressive mathematical function, rather like a random number generator and exactly like a finite state machine.

    Cause and effect.

    The seeding figure or input to this function would be the exact number of individual particles in the universe, but even if that number is not known by using mathematically similar numbers he would get a result of lesser granularity and resolution.

    If the future is written then there is only Fate or Faith – perhaps these were once the same word…

    Because a finite state machine is a computer, and given the number of connections, certainly sentient.

    • Dave Marsay says:

      Jonathan, Thanks. As mathematics the theories that you mention can have no relevance, unless we think that the world is socially constructed by Physicists. 😉

      What do you mean by a closed system? Does it allow for novelty? I think that I am capable of creativity, and you can hardly blame me if I disagreed that this was impossible.

      I’m currently getting my ideas together, but I think that science only looks for regularities and as such is blind to free will. But just because free will is ‘unscientific’ doesn’t mean that it isn’t real. I would need to think about your examples.

  60. Pingback: The money forecast « djmarsay

  61. Pingback: Hercock’s Cohesion « djmarsay

  62. Pingback: Avoiding ‘Black Swans’ « djmarsay

  63. Pingback: Uncertainty Puzzle « djmarsay

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s